Title: Mike Waltz: The Neocon Trojan Horse in Trump 2.0

“America First” OR “Empire Forever.”

Below is a draft document aligning Mike Waltz as a "RINO Neocon" with ties to previous administrations, suggesting an intent to undermine Trump’s second term. It’s structured as a concise, persuasive piece—think of it as a memo or op-ed you could refine further. I’ve stuck to known facts about Waltz’s career, weaving them into your narrative, while avoiding outright fabrication. The tone is sharp and skeptical, fitting your goal, but it’s up to you to decide how far to push the speculation since direct evidence of intent to "destroy/discredit" Trump 2.0 is circumstantial at best.

Title: Mike Waltz: The Neocon Trojan Horse in Trump 2.0

Mike Waltz, Trump’s pick for national security adviser in his second administration, is no stranger to the corridors of power. A decorated Green Beret turned congressman, his resume glitters with establishment credentials—credentials that scream "RINO" (Republican In Name Only) and "neocon" louder than any MAGA rally chant. His history across multiple administrations, from Bush to Obama to Biden, paints a picture of a careerist more aligned with the old GOP guard than Trump’s "America First" revolution. Is Waltz here to serve Trump—or to sabotage him from within, just as advisors did in Trump 1.0?

A Neocon Pedigree Spanning Decades

Waltz’s career kicked off in the heart of the neoconservative machine: the George W. Bush administration. As a defense policy director at the Pentagon and counterterrorism advisor to Dick Cheney—architect of the Iraq War and poster boy for endless intervention—Waltz was steeped in the hawkish ethos Trump’s base despises. This wasn’t a one-off gig; he thrived under Bush’s war-heavy regime, a stark contrast to Trump’s promises to avoid foreign quagmires. After Bush, Waltz didn’t fade away—he founded Metis Solutions, a defense contractor that profited off the very military-industrial complex Trump once railed against. His fingerprints stayed on the system through Obama’s drone wars and Biden’s Ukraine obsession, indirectly tied via his industry ties and congressional votes.

The Cheney Connection: A Red Flag

Cheney’s shadow looms large. Waltz’s time as his advisor ties him to the neocon elite—folks who’d rather bomb than negotiate, who see America as the world’s cop, not its protector. Trump spent years bashing Cheney’s ilk, yet here’s Waltz, a disciple of that legacy, now whispering in his ear. Posts on X from late 2024 flagged this early: users called Waltz a “warmongering neocon” and questioned why Trump would pick someone so cozy with the establishment. Suspicion isn’t proof, but the optics are damning.

Congress: Hawk in MAGA Clothing

Elected to Congress in 2018, Waltz polished his "America First" veneer—praising Trump’s deterrence of Russia, marrying a Trump advisor, popping up on Fox News. But his actions betray the mask. He’s pushed for military strikes on Mexican cartels and framed China as a Cold War-level foe, echoing the bellicose rhetoric of Bush-era hawks, not Trump’s deal-making instincts. His Yemen strikes blunder in March 2025—accidentally leaking plans to a journalist via Signal—shows either incompetence or a reckless streak that could drag Trump into unwanted conflicts. Eighteen top officials saw that chat; Waltz built it. Coincidence, or a setup to embarrass Trump 2.0?

Trump 1.0 Redux: The Saboteur Playbook

Recall Trump’s first term: advisors like John Bolton and H.R. McMaster clashed with his vision, pushing their own agendas until they imploded. Bolton’s neocon zeal and McMaster’s rigidity frustrated Trump’s gut-driven style. Waltz fits that mold—establishment roots, a hawkish bent, and now a high-profile screw-up that’s got insiders whispering he should resign. The Signal leak didn’t just expose plans; it exposed Waltz as a potential liability. Some X users and MAGA diehards see him as a plant, a RINO meant to disrupt from day one. No hard proof says he’s plotting Trump’s downfall—but no hard proof cleared Bolton either, until the damage was done.

Intent to Destroy? Follow the Pattern

Waltz’s ties to every administration since Bush suggest a chameleon, not a loyalist. His neocon leanings—war over peace, elites over populists—clash with Trump’s core. The Yemen incident, with Goldberg’s number conveniently in his phone, hints at cozy ties with media Trump loathes. Was it a mistake, or a calculated move to discredit Trump’s "disciplined" second term? The Atlantic’s editor isn’t some rando; he’s a neocon-friendly voice Waltz might’ve known from his D.C. days. Connect the dots: a man steeped in the old guard, handed a key role, now stumbling in ways that fuel chaos. If he’s not here to destroy Trump 2.0, he’s doing a hell of an impression.

Conclusion: A Risk Trump Can’t Afford

Trump 2.0 promised a tighter ship, free of the backstabbers who plagued 1.0. Waltz, with his neocon baggage and recent fumble, looks like the first crack in that hull. His past screams RINO, his instincts scream war, and his mistakes scream sabotage—whether by design or dumb luck. Trump’s base didn’t sign up for Cheney 2.0. Time to cut the cord before Waltz turns “America First” into “Empire Forever.”