A federal judge in the Southern District of New York ordered the release of the Ashley Biden Diary criminal investigation affidavit and search warrant materials related to the FBI’s raid on James O’Keefe’s newsroom. However, nearly every word of the probable cause section has been redacted. Page 43 of the affidavit states, “probable cause justifying search of the person and subject premises,” but the justification itself is entirely redacted Instead, the only visible footnote states, “Based upon my training and experience, I have learned amongst other things that cell phones are capable of sending emails.” O’Keefe calls this absurd, questioning how such a vague statement could justify a raid on a newsroom. He argues, “If you’re going to take the extraordinary step of using violence against people and going through their notebooks, you need to know the reason.”
The affidavit also includes documentation of O’Keefe being forced to unlock his phone for law enforcement, stating, “Law enforcement personnel are authorized to obtain from James O’Keefe the display of biometric characteristics.” O’Keefe likens this to “a clockwork orange” scenario, describing it as an invasive tactic used against journalists with confidential sources.
The document lists alleged crimes such as “conspiracy to transport across state lines, interstate transportation of property, possession of stolen goods, aiding and abetting, accessory after the fact, and misprision of a felony.” Yet, O’Keefe argues that he “never even spoke with these sources” or “emailed them,” questioning the basis of these accusations. Throughout the affidavit, the government redacted even seemingly irrelevant details, such as O’Keefe’s date of birth,” to which O’Keefe remarked “Wikipedia shows when I was born. I don’t know why they need to redact the year I was born.” Calling the level of secrecy “a national disgrace,” O’Keefe asserts that the excessive redactions serve to protect prosecutors from scrutiny, stating, “The judge, Annalisa Torres, has the power to unredact this,” and vows legal action.
Lara Logan reflects on what it means to face real danger, and why “you can't live in fear.”
When fear takes over, she says, “you don’t have the capacity to do the right thing for the right reason.”
Watch the Full Episode at https://okeefemediagroup.com/lara-logan-my-price-is-my-life-with-james-okeefe-1/
Listen to My Price Is My Life at https://mypriceismylife.podbean.com/
The CIA didn’t just discredit Webb, they systematically took him down. Lara Logan says the CIA ran a counter-op, using the press to dismantle him, and it worked.
Now, Logan warns: if we let that happen again, the truth dies with the messenger.
Watch the Full Episode at https://okeefemediagroup.com/lara-logan-my-price-is-my-life-with-james-okeefe-1/
Listen to My Price Is My Life at https://mypriceismylife.podbean.com/
Lara Logan risked her life for the truth, then the media turned on her. She explains why telling the truth is worth the cost.
Get Up To $20,000 In Bonus Silver NOW:
Support the Mission, Join the Movement:
https://okeefemediagroup.com/get-full-access/
Subscribe and Support Lara Logan Here:
If you are an employee of the Small Business Administration or you're aware of minority-certified or socially disadvantaged businesses exploiting certification processes, we want to hear from you.
We are investigating cases of corruption, including fraudulent practices such as falsifying certifications or taking advantage of shortcuts in the certification process.
Contact O’Keefe Media Group confidentially:
Signal: 914-491-9395
Email: [email protected]
James,
I’ve been working on something I think you’ll find highly relevant to your post referenced here—a critique of AI’s limitations, especially in fields like law. I’d love to hear your thoughts once it’s ready.
Attached is a teaser of me discovering an AI blind spot. It made a claim and called it a "mic-drop moment" without considering counterexamples which I quickly identified...
Edit: Added ChatGPT's take on AI biases in legal matters